The biggest fraud ever? On Pfizer-vaccine trials and ivermectin research
The biggest fraud ever? On Pfizer-vaccine trials and ivermectin research
While you probably were glued to the tube/radio for the past few weeks in order to follow the news about the war in Ukraine, there was also plenty to find out about the developments surrounding the SARS-COV2 coronavirus.
On one hand, thousands of pages of data were suddenly published about the authorization process of the Pfizer vaccine which showed how negative side-effects were already apparent but downplayed.
On the other hand, it became clear that the opposite had happened with the assessment of ivermectin as a medicine in COVID-19 due to censorship.
On the other hand, it became clear that the opposite had happened with the assessment of ivermectin as a medicine in COVID-19 due to censorship.
Doctor Tess Lawrie expressed her disappointment in a short video
Just a week later, a documentary in which various scientists were interviewed on their stance regarding the vaccin and lockdown was going to be shown to a live audience in Amsterdam.
Unfortunately, the public screening in a cinema theater was cancelled at the very last moment. The cancelment generated so much publicity that it had the unexpected side effect that a much larger audience was able to see the documentary online at the planned time on Rumble.
You will find links to several documentaries at the end of this article.
In addition, you can read an opinion article by journalist Alain Grootaers, which summarizes the enormous abuses surrounding the vaccine trials of Pfizer and the censorship of favorable research into ivermectin.
The biggest fraud ever?
by Alain GrootaersThe jab, its' consequences and ivm
While the whole world looks to Ukraine and Russia, in the United States and England the skeletons start tumbling out of the closet. This week, two notable pieces of news were simultaneously overshadowed that expose the entire Covid craziness as what it was all the time: a broad daylight raid on the world's population and an unprecedented case of scientific and institutional fraud.
Let's start in the US, where Pfizer, the CDC (Center for Disease Control) and the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) previously tried to keep their data secret for 75 years. Judge Mark T. Pittman fortunately obliged the FDA and Pfizer to release the research data on the mRNA vaccine.
The FDA chose to do a huge data dump by dropping 55,000 pages all at once in the hope of drowning the critics with it. Those documents now show that Pfizer encountered 1,291 side effects when testing the vaccine, including extremely serious cases that could lead to serious illness and death in the testing phase already.
The list includes myocarditis, acute renal disease, brain stem embolism, brain stem thrombosis, cardiac arrest, heart failure, central nervous system vasculitis, neonatal death, hemorrhagic encephalitis, and so on.
In the US, the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System) noted that 1.13 million Americans have reported side effects to date. 2,4402 people died from those side effects.
Those are just the spontaneously reported deaths caused by the vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna. Previous research showed that only 1% of vaccine side effects are reported. After all, doctors are often embarassed when they first recommend a vaccine to their patient and then have to report 'death from vaccine', so such reports are quite rare.
It is the first time in history, a vaccine - actually not a classic vaccin, but in effect a gene therapy - with that many side effects was ever approved. The data is so shocking that it's currently not just labeled as science fraud, but Republican Senator Ron Johnson is asking for the launch of a criminal investigation.
Something that Republicans can enforce if they are able to win the midterm elections and gain a majority in the Senate.
Currently polls indicate that it is quite likely this will happen.
Almost at the same, at our side of the Atlantic, the English dr. Tess Lawrie, threw a giant bombshell with a 18 minute video she launched.
Lawrie is a physician and researcher, works as a consultant for the WHO and leads her own research group Evidence Based Medicine Consultancy. Before the vaccines came on the market, Lawrie was researching the use of Ivermectin as a drug against Covid, along with many other researchers at various universities and research centers.
They all came with the same result: Ivermectin did indeed work as a medicine and as a prophylactic against Covid19.
According to the studies, as many as 80% of patients with Covid19 would recover thanks to the use of ivermectin.
Another researcher – Dr. Andrew Hill was requested by the WHO to do a meta-analysis of available studies on ivermectin. Then something really strange happened. In the original text of that meta-analysis which was placed on a pre-print server, Dr. Hill draws the conclusion that Ivermectin does indeed work very well.
In his final conclusion though, he says there is not enough conclusive evidence yet and asks for more research to be done, which is a bizarre contradiction.
This conclusion was so astounding that dr Lawrie called her colleague in a video conference to ask for more clarity .
Fortunately, Lawrie recorded those video conversations and we can follow their conversations in amazement.
In the conference, dr. Hill freely admits that - based on all the research - he is in favuor of using ivermectin, because it is 80% effective and very cheap. He also says he is under pressure and, after hesitating, also admits that the people of Unitaid are his "shadow authors".
In other words; Unitaid has held onto its pen as far as the conclusions of its investigation are concerned.
Unitaid is a research group in which Bill Gates, among others, has invested - there he is again.
The result of Hill's meta-study was the discontinuation of ivermectin as a drug against Covid19.
The reason behind the necessity to ban or at least recommend against ivermectin was that the vaccines would only be allowed on the market when there was no drug that could work prophylactically against the virus. If ivermectin had bene allowed, the whole vaccination circus would have come to an early end.
The carousel of freedom-restricting measures would also have turned out to be unnecessary. So it was important not only to take ivermectin off the shelf and ban it for use against Covid19, but also to ridicule it as a 'dewormer for livestock'.
The crazy part is that ivermectin had been labeled as a basic medicine for humans for several decades already, and its inventors had been awarded the Nobel Prize. You certainly don't get a Nobel prize for developing a horse deworming cure.
The state virologists in Belgium, led by Marc Van Ranst, repeated that outright lie, upon which our old mainstream media let him make those statements without even a single word of criticism.
At the same time, every article that even just contained the word ivermectin was removed from social media and you would even risk a ban.
And so a drug that could have saved millions of lives and prevented so many millions of more serious symptoms was banned, paving the way for the roll-out of the vaccines, which later proved to be of limited effect and which - on the contrary - has killed many people or made them seriously ill because of the side effects.
Not to mention the effects of the measures; psychiatrists for both adults and children can no longer handle the influx of patients. Meanwhile, Pfizer and Moderna could barely keep up with crediting the billions of euros and dollars to their bank account.
Pfizer made $37 billion from their Covid vaccine until the end of 2021.
However, right now, institutional investors are already see it coming and are taking their profits by unloading their shares of Pfizer and Moderna.
By late February, Bill Gates openly stated at the Munich Security Conference that he regretted that Omicron had done a better job for global immunity than the vaccines.
You have been deceived and cheated in the greatest global fraud ever committed.
Those responsible who knowingly and willingly participated in this will be held accountable. In the US that will certainly happen; the heads of Fauci and employees of the CDC are already there on the chopping block.
The Belgian state virologists, also known as "De Paniekzaaiers" (The Alarmists), should start looking for a lawyer.
original article can be read at Artsen voor Vrijheid
Link to Tess Lawrie's video: "a letter to Andrew Hill"
More recent results of large-scale research on ivermectin in Brazil and India as presented by dr John Campbell
Research article: Ivermectin Prophylaxis Used for COVID-19: A Citywide, Prospective, Observational Study of 223,128 Subjects Using Propensity Score Matching
"Gideon documentary with English subtitles at blckbx tv
Another similar documentary with international experts in German (Dutch / English subtitles) : Auf der Suche nach der Wahrheit"
Many of the same critical scientits that were briefly interviewed in 'Gideon' were able to speak their minds much longer in a series of interviews called 'Tegenwind' (Headwind). You can find these interviess on the blckbx website with the tag 'tegenwind'. All of them are also subtitled in English.
As of April 2022, there will be a sequel to this series, but now with international experts, among which Robert Malone with the same title in English: Headwind.
As of April 2022, there will be a sequel to this series, but now with international experts, among which Robert Malone with the same title in English: Headwind.
To the main pageNext article
